EU Parliament rejects bid to strip Exxon lobbyists of access

Strasbourg, France | AFP | 

The European Parliament on Tuesday rejected a move to strip ExxonMobil lobbyists of their access badges after the US oil giant missed the assembly’s first hearing into claims it knowingly misled the public on climate change.

The parliament’s secretary general Klaus Welle “found no grounds to seek authorisation to withdraw or de-activate ExxonMobil’s access badges, given the absence of formal summons to attend the hearing,” according to a copy of his decision obtained by AFP.

Welle invited parliament administrators known as quaestors not to take any action and they agreed, according to a copy of an email the Greens Party had with the quaestors.

Read: Exxon revenue rises, 4Q profit beats expectations

After last month’s hearing, Greens deputy Molly Scott Cato asked the parliament to deny ExxonMobil, the world’s largest publicly traded oil firm, its handful of registered access badges.

“I’m deeply disappointed that ExxonMobil will continue to have the right (to) haunt the corridors of the Parliament, spreading their disinformation about climate change and blocking the action we need to take to protect the planet for future generations,” Scott Cato said.

Her party lamented that ExxonMobil was saved by a “technicality” because Welle viewed parliament’s email to Exxon as “exploratory” to check the firm’s availability rather than a formal summons to the hearing.

“If we want a real democracy in Europe, the Parliament needs to show that it is serious when it organises public hearings on important issues,” Cato said in a statement.

Read: Papua New Guinea minister resigns over vast gas contract

US to speed up astronaut return to Moon: target 2024

“We need to produce a legally watertight official invitation, issue it to Exxon, and let them make a choice being accountable and keeping out of the Parliament.”

Under parliamentary rules, lobbyists can have their access badges denied when they refuse without good reason to comply with a formal summons to attend a committee hearing.

The Greens said ExxonMobil has six access badges, but Welle said it had five badges.

In a letter to parliament before the hearing, ExxonMobil said it was “constrained from participating because of ongoing climate litigation in the United States.”

The oil firm was concerned that public commentary, including at the Brussels hearing, “could prejudice those pending proceedings.”

Testifying at the hearing, Harvard University researcher Geoffrey Supran referred to a peer-reviewed study in which he and colleagues contrasted ExxonMobil’s public and private stances.

Read: Energy giants spent $1bn on climate lobbying, PR since Paris: watchdog

The study referred to private company memos where Exxon had acknowledged for decades that global warming was real and caused by humans. Yet, the study said hundreds of paid Exxon editorials in US newspapers cast doubt on the cause.

ExxonMobil has repeatedly rejected what it calls the “false allegation that ExxonMobil suppressed scientific research on climate change.”


© Agence France-Presse

Like it? Share with your friends!


What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
confused confused
fail fail
fun fun
geeky geeky
love love
lol lol
omg omg
win win


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Choose A Format
Personality quiz
Series of questions that intends to reveal something about the personality
Trivia quiz
Series of questions with right and wrong answers that intends to check knowledge
Voting to make decisions or determine opinions
Formatted Text with Embeds and Visuals
The Classic Internet Listicles
The Classic Internet Countdowns
Open List
Submit your own item and vote up for the best submission
Ranked List
Upvote or downvote to decide the best list item
Upload your own images to make custom memes
Youtube, Vimeo or Vine Embeds
Soundcloud or Mixcloud Embeds
Photo or GIF
GIF format